From 1c7e6b26f057eb8ed833ea71de5811a829516f7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Daniel=20Kochma=C5=84ski?= Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:14:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] doc: update doc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Signed-off-by: Daniel Kochmański --- doc/ansi_data_flow.xml | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/ansi_data_flow.xml b/doc/ansi_data_flow.xml index 939baa0..6c70dbf 100644 --- a/doc/ansi_data_flow.xml +++ b/doc/ansi_data_flow.xml @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
<function>LET</function>, <function>FLET</function>, - <function>LABELS</function> and <emphasis>lambda list</emphasis> - &ANSI; addendum + LABELS and function lambda + list &ANSI; addendum &ANSI; doesn't specify what should happen if any of the LET, FLET and @@ -25,10 +25,10 @@ Moreover, while &ANSI; defines lambda list parameters in the terms of - LET*, programmer can't provide an - initialization forms for required parameters. If required - parameters share the same name error is - signalled. + LET*, when used in function context programmer + can't provide an initialization forms for required parameters. If + required parameters share the same name error + is signalled. Described behavior is present in &ECL; since version -- 2.9.0